Buyer education

The number on the brochure
is not the session in the room.

Gauss and Tesla figures are easy to advertise and hard to compare. Two machines with dramatic headline intensity can feel nothing alike once an applicator is on a person. This page is about field at the tissue, waveform, placement, and whether staff will actually use the system on a Tuesday.

Illustration comparing waveform precision and raw output

The incomplete question

“What’s the Gauss rating?”

It is one of the most common questions in PEMF—and one of the easiest to overvalue. Gauss measures magnetic flux density, but raw strength does not explain the complete treatment signal.

High field strength can exist without telling you anything about pulse character, timing, delivery distance, or biological context.

Waveform precision versus raw magnetic field strength

Power needs precision

The signal is the therapy.

Two systems can publish the same peak strength and still deliver very different experiences. The quality of the signal and the way it reaches the body matter.

Pulse shapeTimingField coherenceCoil proximityPractitioner-directed placement

Built for results

Biological resonance, not spec sheets.

ERT’s design prioritizes the relationship among waveform, timing, proximity, and practical control.

Field strength falls rapidly with distance. A headline Gauss number therefore cannot describe what reaches the body without context about delivery design and placement.

PRIVATE CONSULTATION

Still comparing boxes on spec sheets?

Bring the spec sheets to the demo. David will walk through field at the tissue, waveform, placement, and the practical questions that change how a system gets used.

David Petroviak, creator of the ERT system